Mysql的一条SQL优化(二)
2015-06-20 00:33
597 查看
开发过来查看我做的调整,发现我创建的索引其实在另一个测试库上(测试库2)已经创建好了,但为什么测试库2上还是慢呢?
于是上测试库2查看,发现之前我创建的2个列的索引确实已经有了,并且还多了一个索引i_msource_type:
Indexes Columns
Index_Type
PRIMARY ext_id
Unique
i_mobile mobile
i_msource_type msource_type
i_msource_id msource_id
而msource_type列的可选择性是非常低了,基本上到这里我大概知道是怎么回事了,剩下的事情就是验证我的猜测,explain:
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1);
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | m_vip_ext | ref | i_mobile,i_msource_type,i_msource_id | i_msource_type | 4 | const | 58383 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.17 sec)
果不其然,Mysql的优化器并没有选择之前的2个索引,而是选择了可选择性很低的i_msource_type,这无疑是比全表扫描效率更低的一种方式。
果断drop掉索引:
mysql> alter table m_vip_ext drop index i_msource_type;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
再次explain:
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1);
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | m_vip_ext | index_merge | i_mobile,i_msource_id | i_msource_id,i_mobile | 98,99 | NULL | 2 | Using sort_union(i_msource_id,i_mobile); Using where |
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.17 sec)
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1) \G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: m_vip_ext
type: index_merge
possible_keys: i_mobile,i_msource_id
key: i_msource_id,i_mobile
key_len: 98,99
ref: NULL
rows: 2
Extra: Using sort_union(i_msource_id,i_mobile); Using where
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
ERROR:
No query specified
mysql> show status like '%cost%';
+-----------------+----------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-----------------+----------+
| Last_query_cost | 7.328006 |
+-----------------+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
OK了,开发人员用测试库2做的压测,反映并发也能上1000了。
于是上测试库2查看,发现之前我创建的2个列的索引确实已经有了,并且还多了一个索引i_msource_type:
Indexes Columns
Index_Type
PRIMARY ext_id
Unique
i_mobile mobile
i_msource_type msource_type
i_msource_id msource_id
而msource_type列的可选择性是非常低了,基本上到这里我大概知道是怎么回事了,剩下的事情就是验证我的猜测,explain:
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1);
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | m_vip_ext | ref | i_mobile,i_msource_type,i_msource_id | i_msource_type | 4 | const | 58383 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+--------------------------------------+----------------+---------+-------+-------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.17 sec)
果不其然,Mysql的优化器并没有选择之前的2个索引,而是选择了可选择性很低的i_msource_type,这无疑是比全表扫描效率更低的一种方式。
果断drop掉索引:
mysql> alter table m_vip_ext drop index i_msource_type;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
再次explain:
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1);
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | m_vip_ext | index_merge | i_mobile,i_msource_id | i_msource_id,i_mobile | 98,99 | NULL | 2 | Using sort_union(i_msource_id,i_mobile); Using where |
+----+-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------+------+------+------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.17 sec)
mysql> explain select ext_id, mid, msource_id, msource_type, referee, mobile, tel, mpassword,status from m_vip_ext where (msource_id='xx1391434680574433' and msource_type=1 ) or ( mobile='1391434680574433' and msource_type=1) \G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: m_vip_ext
type: index_merge
possible_keys: i_mobile,i_msource_id
key: i_msource_id,i_mobile
key_len: 98,99
ref: NULL
rows: 2
Extra: Using sort_union(i_msource_id,i_mobile); Using where
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
ERROR:
No query specified
mysql> show status like '%cost%';
+-----------------+----------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-----------------+----------+
| Last_query_cost | 7.328006 |
+-----------------+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
OK了,开发人员用测试库2做的压测,反映并发也能上1000了。
相关文章推荐
- Mysql的一条SQL优化(一)
- Windows Server 2003 下配置 MySQL 集群(Cluster)教程
- mysql 5.6 内存 占用过多
- C#连接mysql数据库
- mysql优化
- 上课笔记第三十一天MySQL并发控制、引擎、用户权限管理、查询缓存
- mysql性能优化的21个实践和使用索引
- MySQL数据库优化学习笔记
- MySQL数据库的安装与配置(Windows)
- MySQL隔离等级
- 用MySQL实现微博关注关系的方案分析
- mysql 左连接
- mysql 分区
- mysql数据库结构比较工具
- MySQL行级锁、表级锁、页级锁详细介绍
- MySQL 加锁处理分析
- MySQL优化之——修改默认存储引擎
- Mysql的导入
- mysql常用操作
- mysql查询语句的不等于写法