BT5R3被最新的Kali替代!!
2014-02-26 00:22
330 查看
好不容易折腾了一阵子BT5R3,屁股还没坐热,竟然发现已经被最新的Kali替代了。
官方声明:
http://www.kali.org
放狗了一下,想知道Kali相对于BT5R3到底好在哪里,貌似也没有那么多令人鸡冻的新特性(以下内容为转载):
The most important differences are these:
1. While BackTrack is based on Ubuntu Desktop and used Ubiquity
as the graphical installation program, Kali Linux is based on the latest edition of Debian and uses the Debian Installer (DI).
2. The difference in the graphical installation programs is significant, because with DI comes support for LVM, theLinux
Logical Volume Manager, and full disk encryption. Those are features that you didn’t have with BackTrack’s installer.
3. Another significant difference is that because Ubuntu’s packages are not compatible with Debian packages, upgrading from BackTrack 5 R3 to Kali Linux 1.0 is not recommended. So if you have an installation
of any edition of BackTrack 5, you should be prepared to switch to Kali Linux.
4. The last difference worth noting here is this: With BackTrack 5, you had a choice of two desktop environments – KDE and GNOME 2. However, with Kali Linux, you could roll your own desktop environment,
aside from the default, which is GNOME 3. So, if Cinnamon, KDE, E17 is your choice, the steps for creating them are easy to follow. For example, see how to build
a custom KDE image for Kali Linux.
Refer to:http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/06/10/backtrack-5-or-kali-linux-1-0/
看来还是先用着BT5R3,再慢慢看吧。
官方声明:
BackTrack 5 is OUTDATED and no longer supported – Downloads have been discontinued .
Please check the KALI LINUX project
instead.
http://www.kali.org放狗了一下,想知道Kali相对于BT5R3到底好在哪里,貌似也没有那么多令人鸡冻的新特性(以下内容为转载):
The most important differences are these:
1. While BackTrack is based on Ubuntu Desktop and used Ubiquity
as the graphical installation program, Kali Linux is based on the latest edition of Debian and uses the Debian Installer (DI).
2. The difference in the graphical installation programs is significant, because with DI comes support for LVM, theLinux
Logical Volume Manager, and full disk encryption. Those are features that you didn’t have with BackTrack’s installer.
3. Another significant difference is that because Ubuntu’s packages are not compatible with Debian packages, upgrading from BackTrack 5 R3 to Kali Linux 1.0 is not recommended. So if you have an installation
of any edition of BackTrack 5, you should be prepared to switch to Kali Linux.
4. The last difference worth noting here is this: With BackTrack 5, you had a choice of two desktop environments – KDE and GNOME 2. However, with Kali Linux, you could roll your own desktop environment,
aside from the default, which is GNOME 3. So, if Cinnamon, KDE, E17 is your choice, the steps for creating them are easy to follow. For example, see how to build
a custom KDE image for Kali Linux.
Refer to:http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/06/10/backtrack-5-or-kali-linux-1-0/
看来还是先用着BT5R3,再慢慢看吧。
相关文章推荐
- 构造和为指定值的表达式:±1±2±3±4±5=3 确定符号
- 求解(树的子结构问题-何海涛100题)
- 安装多个VS 出现这个问题
- 【前端盲点】事件的几个阶段你真的了解么???
- 通过init-connect + binlog 实现MySQL审计功能
- JSON资料整理
- POJ 2528 Mayor's posters
- 基于MPMoviePlayerController实现的视频播放的总结
- qt qmake moc pro
- mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0
- IOS开发之__bridge,__bridge_transfer和__bridge_retained
- JAVA的静态变量、静态方法、静态类
- [置顶] 健美计步器-开启超智能健康生活
- Linux的文件搜索神器-find
- 关于Block的copy和循环引用的问题
- Android学习总结之代码的基本特征
- Android Memory/Resource Leak总结
- BigBlueButton 0.81基于Ubuntu 12.04LTS 64位安装
- Tomcat安装(也有jdk,eclipse)
- Netty教程—Part3—ChannelEvent—真的吗?