您的位置:首页 > 其它

开源软件与自由软件

2007-05-30 01:10 411 查看
Linux社区中存在着两种意识形态的运动。自由软件运动(后面我们详细介绍)的目标是使所有软件摆脱知识产权的约束。这项运动的信徒们坚信这些约束会妨碍技术的进步并且对社区无益。开源运动的目标与自由软件运动基本一样,但采取了一种更加务实的方式。这些信徒们依据经济与技术的价值主张源代码可以自由的获得,而自由软件运动是由道德与伦理驱使的。
在这个领域另一端的人们希望对他们的软件维持更加严格的控制。
自由软件运动由自由软件基金会(FSF - Free Software Foundation),一个为GNU项目募集资金的组织,领导。自由软件更可以看作是一种意识形态。一个常用的表达方法是“像言论的自由,而不是免费的啤酒”(译者注:英语中自由与免费是一个词。)。本质上,自由软件试图保证软件的开发者与软件的使用者具有某些相同的权利。这些权利包括出于任何理由运行程序的自由,学习与修改源代码的自由,重新分发源代码的自由以及分享你对源代码所做的修改的自由。为了保证这些自由,GNU通用公共许可证(GPL - General Public License)诞生了。简单的说,GPL规定任何人在GPL下发布的编译程序必须提供该程序的源代码,而且这些程序可以被自由的修改,只要这些修改是以源代码形式可以获得的。这样保证了一旦某一程序对社区“开源”,那么除非该程序的所有作者(包括被修改的部分)达成一致,否则该程序将不能可被“闭源”。大多数Linux程序是在GPL下发布的。
有一点十分重要,需要注意的是GPL并没有涉及任何关于价格的内容。正如它的名字听起来一样古怪,你可以向自由软件收取费用。所谓的free是指你对源代码的自由权利,而不是你使用软件要付的钱。(然而,一旦有人买给你或者给你一个在GPL下发布的编译好的程序,那么他们有义务同样提供改程序的源代码。)
另外一个流行的许可证是BSD许可证。与GPL相反,BSD许可证没有对程序源代码的发布做任何要求。只要满足很少的几个条件,在BSD许可证下发布的软件就允许以源代码或者二进制的形式进行再次发布。软件作者的信誉不能用来作为程序的广告。它同时保证作者免责由于使用软件带来的赔偿责任。在 Slackware Linux中的大多数软件是BSD许可证的。
在还处于起步阶段开源运动的最前线,开放源码倡议(OSI - Open Source Initiative)只是一个为了开放源代码软件,即既有可运行程序也有源代码的软件,获得支持的一个组织。他们不提供一个具体的许可证,但取而代之的是他们支持各种各样类型可用的开源许可证。
OSI的目的是,通过让各个公司撰写自己的开放源代码许可证并得到OSI的认证,使开源得到更多公司的支持。很多公司想发布源代码,但不想使用GPL许可证。由于这些公司无法修改GPL,因此他们允许提供自己的许可证并使其得到OSI的认证。
虽然自由软件基金会和开放源代码倡议相互帮助,但他们却不完全是一回事。自由软件基金会使用一个特定的许可证,并在该许可证下发布软件。开放源代码倡议是为所有的开发源代码许可证寻求支持,包括自由软件基金会的许可证。两个组织对于使源代码自由可用的基本出发点有时区分了这两项运动,但事实上,这两个意识形态不同的组织借助相互的信任向着同一个目标努力。

附原文:
Open Source Software – Free Software http://www.slackbook.org/html/introduction-opensource.html
 Within the Linux community, there are two major ideological movements at work. The Free Software movement (which we'll get into in a moment) is working toward the goal of making all software free of intellectual property restrictions. Followers of this movement believe these restrictions hamper technical improvement and work against the good of the community. The Open Source movement is working toward most of the same goals, but takes a more pragmatic approach to them. Followers of this movement prefer to base their arguments on the economic and technical merits of making source code freely available, rather than the moral and ethical principles that drive the Free Software Movement.  
  At the other end of the spectrum are groups that wish to maintain tighter controls over their software.
  The Free Software movement is headed by the Free Software Foundation, a fund-raising organization for the GNU project. Free software is more of an ideology. The oft-used expression is “free as in speech, not free as in beer”. In essence, free software is an attempt to guarantee certain rights for both users and developers. These freedoms include the freedom to run the program for any reason, to study and modify the source code, to redistribute the source, and to share any modifications you make. In order to guarantee these freedoms, the GNU General Public License (GPL) was created. The GPL, in brief, provides that anyone distributing a compiled program which is licensed under the GPL must also provide source code, and is free to make modifications to the program as long as those modifications are also made available in source code form. This guarantees that once a program is “opened” to the community, it cannot be “closed” except by consent of every author of every piece of code (even the modifications) within it. Most Linux programs are licensed under the GPL.
  It is important to note that the GPL does not say anything about price. As odd as it may sound, you can charge for free software. The “free” part is in the liberties you have with the source code, not in the price you pay for the software. (However, once someone has sold you, or even given you, a compiled program licensed under the GPL they are obligated to provide its source code as well.)
  Another popular license is the BSD license. In contrast to the GPL, the BSD license gives no requirement for the release of a program's source code. Software released under the BSD license allows redistribution in source or binary form provided only a few conditions are met. The author's credentials cannot be used as a sort of advertisement for the program. It also indemnifies the author from liability for damages that may arise from the use of the software. Much of the software included in Slackware Linux is BSD licensed.   
  At the forefront of the younger Open Source movement, the Open Source Initiative is an organization that solely exists to gain support for open source software, that is, software that has the source code available as well as the ready-to-run program. They do not offer a specific license, but instead they support the various types of open source licenses available.   
  The idea behind the OSI is to get more companies behind open source by allowing them to write their own open source licenses and have those licenses certified by the Open Source Initiative. Many companies want to release source code, but do not want to use the GPL. Since they cannot radically change the GPL, they are offered the opportunity to provide their own license and have it certified by this organization.   
  While the Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative work to help each other, they are not the same thing. The Free Software Foundation uses a specific license and provides software under that license. The Open Source Initiative seeks support for all open source licenses, including the one from the Free Software Foundation. The grounds on which each argues for making source code freely available sometimes divides the two movements, but the fact that two ideologically diverse groups are working toward the same goal lends credence to the efforts of each.
内容来自用户分享和网络整理,不保证内容的准确性,如有侵权内容,可联系管理员处理 点击这里给我发消息
标签: