您的位置:首页 > Web前端 > JavaScript

[rxjs] Shares a single subscription -- publish()

2015-08-24 15:45 274 查看
If have an observable and you subscribe it twice, those tow subscritions have no connection.

console.clear();
var Observable = Rx.Observable;
var _id = 1;

var source = Observable.create(function(Observe){
var myId = _id++;
Observe.onNext('Observable ' + myId);
setTimeout(function(){
Observe.onNext('Observable... ' + myId);
Observe.onCompleted();
}, 1000);
});

var subscrition1 = source.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 1: ' + x);
});

var subscrition2 = source.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 2: ' + x);
});


Result:

/*"Observable 1: Observable 1"
"Observable 2: Observable 2"
"Observable 1: Observable... 1"
"Observable 2: Observable... 2"*/


publish():

Returns an observable sequence that is the result of invoking the selector on a connectable observable sequence that shares a single subscription to the underlying sequence.

console.clear();
var Observable = Rx.Observable;
var _id = 1;

var source = Observable.create(function(Observe){
var myId = _id++;
Observe.onNext('Observable ' + myId);
setTimeout(function(){
Observe.onNext('Observable... ' + myId);
Observe.onCompleted();
}, 1000);
});
var published = source.publish();

var subscrition1 = published.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 1: ' + x);
});

var subscrition2 = published.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 2: ' + x);
});

var connection = published.connect();


Results:

/*
"Observable 1: Observable 1"
"Observable 2: Observable 1"
"Observable 1: Observable... 1"
"Observable 2: Observable... 1"
*/


You can see the result just have one single subscrition then.

You can dispose the connection:

connection.dispose();


Results:

/*"Observable 1: Observable 1"
"Observable 2: Observable 1"*/


There is a problem when you connect the published observables at different place.

var Observable = Rx.Observable;
var _id = 1;

var source = Observable.create(function(Observe){
var myId = _id++;
Observe.onNext('Observable ' + myId);
setTimeout(function(){
Observe.onNext('Observable... ' + myId);
Observe.onCompleted();
}, 1000);
});
var published = source.publish();
var connection = published.connect();

var subscrition1 = published.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 1: ' + x);
});

var subscrition2 = published.subscribe(function onNext(x){
console.log('Observable 2: ' + x);
});

//var connection = published.connect();


Results:

/*"Observable 1: Observable... 1"
"Observable 2: Observable... 1"*/


If we move the connect() funciton up before subscribe(). Then we missed the very first console.log(); It means connection is already start, but no one subscribe it yet.

Therefore, we don't use publish() funciton alone, more than often we use publish().refCount() function together.
内容来自用户分享和网络整理,不保证内容的准确性,如有侵权内容,可联系管理员处理 点击这里给我发消息
标签: