Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected
2009-07-31 14:51
766 查看
在虚拟机上运行copy过来的redhat，发现网络不通，于是修改网络设置，并且执行service network restart命令，但是老是报Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected，网上找了该问题的解决办法：
编辑文件:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0,把HWADDR=.... 这行删掉就行了，或者注释掉就可以了。够简单吧！
感谢这位仁兄: http://hi.baidu.com/baowup/blog/item/88dba77f3d07e80c28388a5f.html/cmtid/39de553915c509f83a87ceba
编辑文件:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0,把HWADDR=.... 这行删掉就行了，或者注释掉就可以了。够简单吧！
感谢这位仁兄: http://hi.baidu.com/baowup/blog/item/88dba77f3d07e80c28388a5f.html/cmtid/39de553915c509f83a87ceba
内容来自用户分享和网络整理，不保证内容的准确性，如有侵权内容，可联系管理员处理 
相关文章推荐
- Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring
- 复制vmware server虚拟机不能上网问题(Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected)
- Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ign
- linux 重启网卡 Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected,
- “Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring.”问题
- vware:Shutting down interface eth0: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring
- “Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring.”问题
- Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected
- device eth0 has different MAC address than expected,igoring
- Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected 激活网卡时报错
- vware:Shutting down interface eth0: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring
- Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring.
- “Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring.”问题
- 虚拟机中装Linux配置网络时提示：Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected 的解决方法
- VMware 克隆centos虚拟机 网卡配置问题 Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring.
- CentOS5： Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected
- vmware虚拟机centos网络配置错误，执行/etc/init.d/network start 或 restart 提示Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring
- The newly created daemon process has a different context than expected
- The newly created daemon process has a different context than expected
- What is the maximum amount of memory any single process on Windows can address? Is this different than the maximum virtual memor