NOSQL非关系型数据库学习(四)这样对比下HBASE, MEMCACHED, MONGODB, REDIS和SOLR
2014-06-03 18:02
756 查看
Source
http://db-engines.com/en/system/HBase%3BMemcached%3BRedis%3BSolr
http://db-engines.com/en/system/HBase%3BMemcached%3BRedis%3BSolr
Name | HBase | Memcached | MongoDB | Redis | Solr |
Description | Wide-column store based on Apache Hadoop and on concepts of BigTable | In-memory key-value store, originally intended for caching | One of the most popular document stores | In-memory database with configurable options performance vs. persistency | A widely usedenterprise search engine based onApache Lucene |
Developer | Apache Software Foundation | Danga Interactive | MongoDB, Inc | Salvatore Sanfilippo | Apache Software Foundation |
Initial release | 2008 | 2003 | 2009 | 2009 | 2004 |
License | Open Source | Open Source | Open Source | Open Source | Open Source |
Implementation language | Java | C | C++ | C | Java |
Server operating systems | Linux | Linux | Linux | Linux | All OS with a Java VM and a servlet container |
Unix | Unix | ||||
OS X | OS X | ||||
Windows | Windows | Windows | Windows | ||
FreeBSD | Solaris | BSD | |||
Database model | Wide column store | Key-value store | Document store | Key-value store | Search engine |
Data scheme | schema-free | schema-free | schema-free | schema-free | yes |
Typing | no | no | yes | no | yes |
Secondary indexes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
SQL | no | no | no | no | no |
APIs and other access methods | Java API | Proprietary protocol | proprietary protocol using JSON | proprietary protocol | Java API |
RESTful HTTP API | RESTful HTTP API | ||||
Thrift | |||||
Supported programming languages | C | C | C | C | |
C# | .Net | C# | C# | .Net | |
C++ | C++ | C++ | C++ | ||
Groovy | ColdFusion | Groovy | Clojure | ||
Java | Java | Java | Java | Java | |
Erlang | Erlang | Erlang | Erlang | ||
Python | Python | Python | Python | Python | |
Scala | Lua | Scala | Scala | Scala | |
Ruby | Ruby | Ruby | Ruby | ||
PHP | PHP | PHP | PHP | PHP | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | JavaScript | |||
Perl | Perl | Perl | Perl | ||
OCaml | Lua | Lua | any language that supports sockets and either XML or JSON | ||
Lisp | Lisp | Lisp | |||
Dart | Dart | ||||
ColdFusion | |||||
Go | Go | ||||
Actionscript | Objective-C | ||||
Haskell | Haskell | ||||
Smalltalk | Smalltalk | ||||
Clojure | Tcl | ||||
MatLab | |||||
PowerShell | |||||
Prolog | |||||
Server-side scripts | yes | no | JavaScript | Lua | Java plugins |
Triggers | yes | no | no | no | no |
Partitioning methods | Sharding | none | Sharding | none | Sharding |
Replication methods | selectable replication factor | none | Master-slave replication | Master-slave replication | cloud/distributed (via Zookeeper) |
Master-slave replication | |||||
MapReduce | yes | no | yes | no | no |
Consistency concepts | Immediate Consistency | Eventual Consistency | Eventual Consistency | ||
Immediate Consistency | |||||
Foreign keys | no | no | no | no | no |
Transaction concepts | no | no | no | optimistic locking | optimistic locking |
Concurrency | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Durability | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
User concepts | Access Control Lists (ACL) | yes | Users can be defined with full access or read-only access | very simple password-based access control | |
Specific characteristics | Redis very much emphasize performance. In any design decisions performance has priority over features or memory requirements. | Architecture: Lives in web stack, ships by default with Jetty. Connectors, JDBC, multiple languages, true morphological CJK, binary document filters (Tika), Entity Extraction (UIMA) | |||
Typical application scenarios | Mostly used for caching | Applications that can hold all data in memory, and that have high performance requirements. |
相关文章推荐
- HBase、MongoDB、MySQL、Oracle、Redis--nosql数据库与关系数据库对比
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比(二)
- 对比下HBase, Memcached, MongoDB, Redis和Solr
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比
- HBase, Memcached, MongoDB, Redis和Solr对比
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比
- NoSQL数据库对比-Cassandra,Mongodb,CouchDB,Redis,Riak,HBase
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比(一)
- 【NoSQL】NoSQL简介及常用的NoSQL数据库对比(Redis、MongoDB、HBase等)
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比
- HBase、Redis、MongoDB、Couchbase、LevelDB主流 NoSQL 数据库的对比
- HBase vs. MongoDB vs. MySQL vs. Oracle vs. Redis,三大主流开源 NoSQL 数据库的 PK 两大主流传统 SQL 数据库
- NOSQL数据库大比拼:Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase
- nosql类型的数据库:mongodb、Redis、Memcached的优化点
- mongodb,redis,hbase 三者都是nosql数据库,他们的最大区别和不同定位是什么?
- mongodb,redis,hbase 三者都是nosql数据库,他们的最大区别和不同定位
- 各种nosql数据库的比较Cassandra,MongoDB,CouchDB,Redis,Riak,HBase
- NOSQL数据库大PK:Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase 数据库
- NoSQL数据库 Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase comparison
- 非关系型数据库redis、memcache、mongoDB的对比