在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?- 国外网站的解释
2012-06-22 14:39
555 查看
As Robert mentioned, I think the main thing is that the level of competition has increased to an amount of commitment beyond what most people are willing to put in.
I was a coach at the ACM ICPC in 2005 and heard a similar story about the Shanghai Jiao Tong University team practicing all day for the entire previous summer. When I was on the Caltech team, the team members weren't decided until a few months before the contest, and we only practiced a few hours a month, mainly because everyone on the team had other competing demands on theirtime.
In the US, the best students have opportunities to do research with professors that will lead to them basically being guaranteed admission into a top graduate school,
they have easy access to internships at the top companies, and they don't have as much to gain by winning. In other countries, especially with worse economies, there aren't as many good alternative ways to spend time, and doing well can significantly increase everyone's opportunities. The cultures in those particular countries also reinforce math and science and increase the pool of potential contestants.
I think this is mainly true of ICPC - if you look at the IOI (a high school contest) there are a much wider variety of countries represented among the top finishers, though Russia, China, and Poland are still strong there too.
I was a coach at the ACM ICPC in 2005 and heard a similar story about the Shanghai Jiao Tong University team practicing all day for the entire previous summer. When I was on the Caltech team, the team members weren't decided until a few months before the contest, and we only practiced a few hours a month, mainly because everyone on the team had other competing demands on theirtime.
In the US, the best students have opportunities to do research with professors that will lead to them basically being guaranteed admission into a top graduate school,
they have easy access to internships at the top companies, and they don't have as much to gain by winning. In other countries, especially with worse economies, there aren't as many good alternative ways to spend time, and doing well can significantly increase everyone's opportunities. The cultures in those particular countries also reinforce math and science and increase the pool of potential contestants.
I think this is mainly true of ICPC - if you look at the IOI (a high school contest) there are a much wider variety of countries represented among the top finishers, though Russia, China, and Poland are still strong there too.
相关文章推荐
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 在 ACM竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- [转]在 ACM ICPC 竞赛中,为什么美国的公认的计算机名校,如 MIT,斯坦福、加州伯克利、卡内基梅隆,表现不如中国和俄罗斯的高校?
- 斯坦福、伯克利、MIT、CMU、UIUC计算机专业概况
- 为什么ACM美国不如中国
- 全球恶意网站中国居榜首 美国俄罗斯分列二三名
- 中国第一名校清华不如美国的二流学校?
- 美国网站批评Google未重视中国地震灾害 表现奇怪
- 为什么中国人在中学阶段很厉害,后期表现却不如外国人?
- 中国高校勤工助学网站程序开发质量和管理标准化
- 推荐:国外著名计算机网站
- 转微软高校博客一篇有关中国计算机教育的文章:认清现实,才能找回理想